not logged in
Login
Personal Information
TreeBASE Submissions
Search data
TreeBASE Home
Go to search
Citation
Taxa
Matrices
Trees
Analyses
CiteULike
Delicious
Connotea
Analyses for Study
This study is part of submission (Status: ).
Analyses
Analysis 1
Analysis details
Name
Notes
Input data
1 Input object(s)
GH 5 cellulase
Analysis step
GH 5 cellulase phylogenetic tree --
Step details
Name
Software used
Name
Algorithm
--- Please Select ---
maximum likelihood
parsimony
bayesian inference
minimum evolution
neighbor joining
UPGMA
other algorithm
Commands
Evolution was simulated for 500,000 generations or until maximum likelihood scores reached convergence. Consensus trees were compiled with DendroPy.
Output data
1 Output object(s)
Fig. 9
Analysis 2
Analysis details
Name
Input data
1 Input object(s)
GH 45 cellulase
Analysis step
GH 45 phylogenetic tree --
Step details
Name
Software used
Name
Algorithm
--- Please Select ---
maximum likelihood
parsimony
bayesian inference
minimum evolution
neighbor joining
UPGMA
other algorithm
Commands
Evolution was simulated for 500,000 generations or until maximum likelihood scores reached convergence. Consensus trees were compiled with DendroPy.
Output data
1 Output object(s)
Fig. 11
Analysis 3
Analysis details
Name
Input data
1 Input object(s)
GH 48 cellulase
Analysis step
GH 48 phylogenetic analysis --
Step details
Name
Software used
Name
Algorithm
--- Please Select ---
maximum likelihood
parsimony
bayesian inference
minimum evolution
neighbor joining
UPGMA
other algorithm
Commands
Evolution was simulated for 500,000 generations or until maximum likelihood scores reached convergence. Consensus trees were compiled with DendroPy.
Output data
1 Output object(s)
Fig. 10