@ARTICLE{TreeBASE2Ref26817,
author = {Xinyi Guo and Jianquan Liu and Guoqian Hao and Lei Zhang and Kangshan Mao and Xiaojuan Wang and Dan Zhang and Tao Ma and Quanjun Hu and Ihsan A. Al-Shehbaz and Marcus A Koch},
title = {Plastome phylogeny and early diversification of Brassicaceae},
year = {2017},
keywords = {Plastome, Brassicaceae, phylogenomics, molecular dating, gene loss},
doi = {},
url = {http://},
pmid = {},
journal = {BMC Genomics},
volume = {},
number = {},
pages = {},
abstract = {Background: The family Brassicaceae encompasses diverse species, many of which have high scientific and economic importance. Early diversifications and phylogenetic relationships between major lineages or clades remain unclear. Here we re-investigate Brassicaceae phylogeny with complete plastomes from 51 species representing all four lineages or 5 of 6 major clades (A, B, C, E and F) as identified in earlier studies.
Results: Bayesian and maximum likelihood phylogenetic analyses using a partitioned supermatrix of 77 protein coding genes resulted in nearly identical tree topologies exemplified by highly supported relationships between clades. All four lineages were well identified and interrelationships between them were resolved. The previously defined Clade C was found to be paraphyletic (the genus Megadenia formed a separate lineage), while the remaining clades were monophyletic. Clade E (lineage III) was sister to clades B+C rather than to all core Brassicaceae (clades A+B+C or lineages I+II), as suggested by a previous transcriptome study. Molecular dating based on plastome phylogeny supported the origin of major lineages or clades between late Oligocene and early Miocene, and the following radiative diversification across the family took place within a short timescale. In addition, gene losses in the plastomes occurred multiple times during the evolutionary diversification of the family.
Conclusions: Plastome phylogeny illustrates the early diversification of cruciferous species. This phylogeny will facilitate our further understanding of evolution and adaptation of numerous species in the model family Brassicaceae.
}
}
Citation for Study 20512

Citation title:
"Plastome phylogeny and early diversification of Brassicaceae".

Study name:
"Plastome phylogeny and early diversification of Brassicaceae".

This study is part of submission 20512
(Status: Published).
Citation
Guo X., Liu J., Hao G., Zhang L., Mao K., Wang X., Zhang D., Ma T., Hu Q., Al-shehbaz I.A., & Koch M.A. 2017. Plastome phylogeny and early diversification of Brassicaceae. BMC Genomics, .
Authors
-
Guo X.
-
Liu J.
-
Hao G.
-
Zhang L.
-
Mao K.
-
Wang X.
-
Zhang D.
-
Ma T.
-
Hu Q.
-
Al-shehbaz I.A.
-
Koch M.A.
Abstract
Background: The family Brassicaceae encompasses diverse species, many of which have high scientific and economic importance. Early diversifications and phylogenetic relationships between major lineages or clades remain unclear. Here we re-investigate Brassicaceae phylogeny with complete plastomes from 51 species representing all four lineages or 5 of 6 major clades (A, B, C, E and F) as identified in earlier studies.
Results: Bayesian and maximum likelihood phylogenetic analyses using a partitioned supermatrix of 77 protein coding genes resulted in nearly identical tree topologies exemplified by highly supported relationships between clades. All four lineages were well identified and interrelationships between them were resolved. The previously defined Clade C was found to be paraphyletic (the genus Megadenia formed a separate lineage), while the remaining clades were monophyletic. Clade E (lineage III) was sister to clades B+C rather than to all core Brassicaceae (clades A+B+C or lineages I+II), as suggested by a previous transcriptome study. Molecular dating based on plastome phylogeny supported the origin of major lineages or clades between late Oligocene and early Miocene, and the following radiative diversification across the family took place within a short timescale. In addition, gene losses in the plastomes occurred multiple times during the evolutionary diversification of the family.
Conclusions: Plastome phylogeny illustrates the early diversification of cruciferous species. This phylogeny will facilitate our further understanding of evolution and adaptation of numerous species in the model family Brassicaceae.
Keywords
Plastome, Brassicaceae, phylogenomics, molecular dating, gene loss
External links
About this resource
- Canonical resource URI:
http://purl.org/phylo/treebase/phylows/study/TB2:S20512
- Other versions:
Nexus
NeXML
- Show BibTeX reference
@ARTICLE{TreeBASE2Ref26817,
author = {Xinyi Guo and Jianquan Liu and Guoqian Hao and Lei Zhang and Kangshan Mao and Xiaojuan Wang and Dan Zhang and Tao Ma and Quanjun Hu and Ihsan A. Al-Shehbaz and Marcus A Koch},
title = {Plastome phylogeny and early diversification of Brassicaceae},
year = {2017},
keywords = {Plastome, Brassicaceae, phylogenomics, molecular dating, gene loss},
doi = {},
url = {http://},
pmid = {},
journal = {BMC Genomics},
volume = {},
number = {},
pages = {},
abstract = {Background: The family Brassicaceae encompasses diverse species, many of which have high scientific and economic importance. Early diversifications and phylogenetic relationships between major lineages or clades remain unclear. Here we re-investigate Brassicaceae phylogeny with complete plastomes from 51 species representing all four lineages or 5 of 6 major clades (A, B, C, E and F) as identified in earlier studies.
Results: Bayesian and maximum likelihood phylogenetic analyses using a partitioned supermatrix of 77 protein coding genes resulted in nearly identical tree topologies exemplified by highly supported relationships between clades. All four lineages were well identified and interrelationships between them were resolved. The previously defined Clade C was found to be paraphyletic (the genus Megadenia formed a separate lineage), while the remaining clades were monophyletic. Clade E (lineage III) was sister to clades B+C rather than to all core Brassicaceae (clades A+B+C or lineages I+II), as suggested by a previous transcriptome study. Molecular dating based on plastome phylogeny supported the origin of major lineages or clades between late Oligocene and early Miocene, and the following radiative diversification across the family took place within a short timescale. In addition, gene losses in the plastomes occurred multiple times during the evolutionary diversification of the family.
Conclusions: Plastome phylogeny illustrates the early diversification of cruciferous species. This phylogeny will facilitate our further understanding of evolution and adaptation of numerous species in the model family Brassicaceae.
}
}
- Show RIS reference
TY - JOUR
ID - 26817
AU - Guo,Xinyi
AU - Liu,Jianquan
AU - Hao,Guoqian
AU - Zhang,Lei
AU - Mao,Kangshan
AU - Wang,Xiaojuan
AU - Zhang,Dan
AU - Ma,Tao
AU - Hu,Quanjun
AU - Al-Shehbaz,Ihsan A.
AU - Koch,Marcus A
T1 - Plastome phylogeny and early diversification of Brassicaceae
PY - 2017
KW - Plastome
KW - Brassicaceae
KW - phylogenomics
KW - molecular dating
KW - gene loss
UR - http://dx.doi.org/
N2 - Background: The family Brassicaceae encompasses diverse species, many of which have high scientific and economic importance. Early diversifications and phylogenetic relationships between major lineages or clades remain unclear. Here we re-investigate Brassicaceae phylogeny with complete plastomes from 51 species representing all four lineages or 5 of 6 major clades (A, B, C, E and F) as identified in earlier studies.
Results: Bayesian and maximum likelihood phylogenetic analyses using a partitioned supermatrix of 77 protein coding genes resulted in nearly identical tree topologies exemplified by highly supported relationships between clades. All four lineages were well identified and interrelationships between them were resolved. The previously defined Clade C was found to be paraphyletic (the genus Megadenia formed a separate lineage), while the remaining clades were monophyletic. Clade E (lineage III) was sister to clades B+C rather than to all core Brassicaceae (clades A+B+C or lineages I+II), as suggested by a previous transcriptome study. Molecular dating based on plastome phylogeny supported the origin of major lineages or clades between late Oligocene and early Miocene, and the following radiative diversification across the family took place within a short timescale. In addition, gene losses in the plastomes occurred multiple times during the evolutionary diversification of the family.
Conclusions: Plastome phylogeny illustrates the early diversification of cruciferous species. This phylogeny will facilitate our further understanding of evolution and adaptation of numerous species in the model family Brassicaceae.
L3 -
JF - BMC Genomics
VL -
IS -
ER -